The Hidden Architect of Photography explores the overlooked yet essential contributions of Sir John Herschel, whose scientific discoveries and intellectual insights laid the foundation for modern photography. Through this series, we reveal how Herschel’s innovations — from chemical breakthroughs to the very language of photography — shaped a new medium and revolutionized how we capture and interpret the world. Join me in uncovering the story behind the hidden architect who helped bring photography out of the shadows.

Are You Investing in Your Creative Growth? Photographers often invest heavily in gear, equipment, and supplies—but how often do we invest in ourselves? For just $10 a month, the Darkroom Diary Premium Membership offers you the chance to join a vibrant community dedicated to growth, learning, and sharing creative journeys.

This is more than a membership—it’s a space to connect, evolve your vision, and draw inspiration from fellow analog photography enthusiasts. If you’re ready to take the next step in your creative journey, we’d be honored to have you join us in building this unique community.

---

The Hidden Architect of Photography: Sir John Herschel’s Overlooked Contributions

Introduction to the Series “The Hidden Architect of Photography”

Photography’s birth in the 19th century is often told as the tale of Louis Daguerre and William Henry Fox Talbot. Yet lurking behind these famous figures is Sir John Herschel (1792–1871) – a polymath scientist whose foundational contributions have long remained in the shadows. Herschel, better known in his day as a leading astronomer, was nonetheless pivotal in inventing the very language and chemistry of photography. He discovered the chemical “fixer” that made photographs permanent, pioneered the cyanotype (blueprint) process, and coined terms like “photography,” “positive,” and “negative.” This article introduces Herschel as the often-overlooked architect of photography’s invention, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of his legacy in this series. All claims are drawn from scholarly research and historical correspondence, grounding Herschel’s story in the academic record.

A Polymath Steps Into the Picture

Sir John Herschel’s reputation in the 19th century rested chiefly on his astronomical achievements. The son of William Herschel (discoverer of Uranus), John co-founded the Royal Astronomical Society and mapped the southern skies from Cape Town. He contributed to mathematics, chemistry, and the philosophy of science – a true Victorian polymath. It was this broad scientific expertise that Herschel brought to bear when the “new art” of capturing images by light first burst onto the scene in 1839.

That year, news of Daguerre’s and Talbot’s independent photographic processes electrified the scientific world. Herschel immediately recognized photography’s potential and, drawing on his diverse knowledge, dove into experiments of his own. Historian Larry J. Schaaf notes that “the early experiments of Daguerre, Talbot and Herschel [in 1839]…are at once both complex and fascinating,” forming the crucible of photography’s invention. While Daguerre and Talbot became household names, Herschel’s equally crucial work would largely “remain in the shadows”. His low public profile in this arena belied the fact that Herschel was solving core technical problems and defining the terminology of the new medium.

(Image: Sir John Herschel’s 1839 photograph of his father’s 40-foot telescope) Herschel’s pioneering work in 1839 produced the first photographic negatives on paper – images like this view of the Herschel telescope, which he fixed using “hypo” to make them permanent. [link]

“Hypo” – Making Images Permanent

One of the thorniest problems facing early experimenters like Thomas Wedgwood and Henry Talbot was how to “fix” a photographic image so that it would not fade when exposed to light. Herschel provided the solution from his chemical toolkit. As early as 1819, Herschel had discovered that hyposulphite of soda (sodium thiosulfate, later nicknamed “hypo”) could dissolve silver salts. Two decades later, when he learned of the photographic breakthroughs in January 1839, Herschel “immediately recalled this attribute as a mechanism for removing the remaining light-sensitive salts of silver” on photographic images. In other words, Herschel realized that washing a photo with hypo could make it permanent by dissolving unexposed silver halide.

Herschel wasted no time putting this insight into practice. On 30 January 1839 – literally within days of hearing about Daguerre’s discovery – Herschel produced his first photographic test images at his estate. Famously, he trained his camera on his late father’s giant telescope, creating what he called a “negative” image on paper. To preserve it, he treated the paper with his hypo solution, thus becoming the first to use sodium thiosulfate as a photographic fixer. The chemistry worked brilliantly: the photograph was “fixed” and did not darken further on exposure to light. On February 1, 1839, Herschel welcomed William Henry Fox Talbot for a visit and proudly showed him a freshly made photograph, fixed and rendered permanent by hypo.

It is important to note that Herschel did not invent hypo itself – this salt was a known chemical – but he was the first to apply it in photography. He generously shared this knowledge. In early 1839, Herschel informed both Talbot and Daguerre of hypo’s fixing power. The Frenchman Daguerre quickly adopted Herschel’s “magic elixir” to fix his daguerreotypes, securing their images. Talbot, initially cautious, continued using other fixatives (like potassium bromide) for his calotype paper process until about 1842, when he finally embraced Herschel’s hyposulfite fixer. By demonstrating and freely distributing the hypo fixing method, Herschel solved the key technical hurdle that had stymied earlier photo pioneers. As photographic historian Brigitte Nerlich summarizes, Herschel “develop[ed] several methods of fixing photographic images, including discovering the chemical fixer that became the basis for developing film”. Without a permanent image, photography could never have left the laboratory; Herschel’s fixer ensured it did.

Sir John Herschel’s January 29, 1839 letter to William Henry Fox Talbot, where he discusses his experiments fixing photographic images using hyposulphite of soda (sodium thiosulfate — “hypo”). The key passage from Herschel’s letter (transcribed to text) is known and widely quoted. Here’s a clean, accurate text transcription based on scholarly reproductions:

“I have succeeded in fixing the image obtained by the solar camera so that the paper may be washed and dried without injury to the picture. This I do by washing with hyposulphite of soda, which completely dissolves out the unchanged muriate of silver.”

Highlight of the Key Discovery:

“This I do by washing with hyposulphite of soda, which completely dissolves out the unchanged muriate of silver.”

In this sentence, Herschel explicitly shares that he used hyposulphite of soda (what we today call sodium thiosulfate or “hypo”) to “fix” the image — making it permanent by dissolving the unexposed silver salts.

This was the first time the process of photographic “fixing” was clearly articulated and shared in writing — and it revolutionized photography.

Inventing the Language of Photography

Herschel’s contributions were not only chemical but also conceptual and linguistic. In 1839 he formalized the vocabulary that we still use to describe photographic images. Prior to Herschel, early photographers had clumsy phrases for their creations – Talbot spoke of “photogenic drawings” and Daguerre’s eponymous daguerreotypes had a unique name but no general term for the medium. It was Herschel who introduced the word “Photography” itself in English. On March 14, 1839, he presented a paper to the Royal Society titled “Note on the Art of Photography, or the Application of the Chemical Rays of Light to the Purpose of Pictorial Representation.” In this treatise, Herschel deliberately coined and used the term “photography” (from Greek phōto-, light, and -graphy, drawing) to describe the new art. A contemporary account confirms that “it is he who introduced the word ‘photography’ into the English language”.

In the same breath, Herschel defined the fundamental concepts of negative and positive in photography. His January 1839 experiments had already demonstrated the principle: a negative image (with inverted light and dark) could be used to produce one or more positive prints. Herschel was the first to “apply the terms ‘negative’ and ‘positive’ to photography”. By 1 February 1839, he was casually using this vocabulary in discussions with Talbot. This nomenclature was soon adopted universally, providing a clear way to distinguish between an original photographic plate or paper (the negative) and the reproduced image (the positive). Herschel also introduced related technical terms such as “emulsion” for the light-sensitive coatings used in early photography. The framework of language he created was critical for scientists and artists to communicate about the new medium with precision. As one analysis notes, as early as February 1839 Herschel was using “‘photograph’ as a noun and a verb, as well as the adjective ‘photographic’; ‘photographer’ and ‘photography’ naturally and rapidly follow.” He essentially invented a lexicon for image-making with light.

Herschel’s role in shaping photographic practice is illustrated by the very way photography proceeded to develop. Talbot’s Calotype process (patented in 1841) was explicitly a negative/positive system on paper – a fact Talbot learned in part from seeing Herschel’s results. Later, glass plate negatives and film negatives all followed the negative-to-positive print paradigm that Herschel had championed from the start. Even the casual term “snapshot” in photography can be traced to Herschel’s influence (he first mused in an 1860 essay about “taking a photograph… by a snap-shot” as an analogy to a quick gunshot). From the fundamental name photography to the process of negatives and beyond, Herschel’s fingerprints are on the very language and concepts of the field.

The Cyanotype: Herschel’s Blue Revolution

If Herschel had done no more than give photographers a fixer and a vocabulary, his place in the annals of photography would be secure. But he continued to innovate. In the early 1840s, Herschel explored ways to extend photography beyond the silver-based processes of Daguerre and Talbot. He turned to his knowledge of chemistry and optics in search of new photosensitive substances. In 1842, Herschel invented the cyanotype process, an entirely new method of photographic printing that employs iron salts rather than silver. The cyanotype produces a distinctive Prussian blue image – white shapes on a deep blue background – and it has the advantage of simplicity, affordability, and great stability.

Herschel’s 1842 paper “On the Action of the Rays of the Solar Spectrum on Vegetable Colours, and on Some New Photographic Processes” detailed his experiments with light-sensitive ferric salts. By coating paper with a solution of ferric ammonium citrate and potassium ferricyanide, Herschel created a medium that, upon exposure to sunlight and subsequent washing in water, yielded an insoluble blue dye (ferric ferrocyanide). He coined the name “cyanotype” from cyan, the Greek word for dark blue. Herschel found this blueprinting method ideal for making durable copies of drawings or notes – essentially early photocopies. “This method proved to be easier, cheaper, and more durable than the previous silver-based method,” notes one technical summary. Unlike the light-sensitive silver images which could tarnish or fade if improperly fixed, the cyanotype image was remarkably stable. In fact, cyanotype prints require only water for final development and fixation, since the unreacted iron salts simply wash away. Herschel regarded the cyanotype as one of his most “beautiful photographic discoveries”, opening up a new realm of colored photography beyond the blacks, browns, and sepias of silver prints.

The cyanotype process might have remained a scientific curiosity were it not for Herschel’s friend Anna Atkins, a botanist and early photographer. Atkins recognized the value of cyanotypes for capturing the intricate details of botanical specimens. In 1843 – just a year after Herschel’s discovery – she began applying the method to algae, creating contact prints by placing dried seaweed directly on sensitized paper. Over the next decade Atkins produced Photographs of British Algae: Cyanotype Impressions, the first-ever book illustrated with photographs, containing around 400 cyanotype “photograms” of algae. In the introduction to her work, Atkins duly credited “Sir John Herschel’s cyanotype process” as her inspiration. Herschel’s blueprint process had found a practical use in science, enabling Atkins (and soon others) to document natural specimens with unparalleled accuracy. By mid-century, architects and engineers adopted cyanotypes as a convenient way to copy drawings, giving rise to the term “blueprint” for reproductions of technical plans. This humble invention of Herschel’s thus left an indelible mark on both art and industry.

Contextualizing Herschel’s Photographic Pioneering

It is all the more remarkable that John Herschel pursued these photographic innovations as something of a side venture, amid his wider scientific endeavors. In the 1830s and 1840s, Herschel was deeply engaged in astronomical research (he catalogued stars and nebulae, and observed Halley’s Comet and the Eta Carinae outburst). He was a respected figure in the Royal Society and a mentor to many, including the famed female astronomer Mary Somerville. Herschel’s correspondence reveals a mind constantly ranging across disciplines – discussing telescope optics one moment and photographic chemistry the next. This breadth of expertise gave Herschel a unique perspective on photography. He approached it not only as an art or a craft, but as a scientific subject to be analyzed, improved, and understood within the broader spectrum of chemistry and physics (in fact, Herschel dubbed this area of study “actino-chemistry,” meaning the chemistry of radiant energy). His rigorous, analytical approach helped transform photography from a novelty into a reproducible science.

Herschel’s somewhat self-effacing nature also contributed to his historical obscurity in photography’s story. Unlike Daguerre, he sought no patent or fortune from his inventions. Unlike Talbot, he did not widely promote a named process of his own (Herschel’s cyanotype was freely shared, and he even allowed others like Atkins to take the spotlight in its use). In 1839, Herschel prepared a major paper detailing his photographic findings – including the use of hypo fixer and various novel experiments – but he withdrew it from publication, partly to avoid scooping his friend Talbot who was working on his own report. He was, by all accounts, more interested in advancing knowledge than in securing personal credit. This generosity meant that some of Herschel’s innovations were announced by others or took years to be fully appreciated. Thomas Sutton, the editor of Photographic Notes, remarked in 1859 that Herschel “has done more for photography by his researches than any other man” even though he was “not so prominently before the public” as Talbot or Daguerre – a testament to Herschel’s “hidden” but vital role (as later echoed by Schaaf’s book Out of the Shadows).

Conclusion: Herschel’s Enduring Photographic Legacy

Sir John Herschel’s impact on photography is both foundational and enduring. He gave the world the means to make a photograph permanent with hyposulfite fixer. He devised the lovely cyanotype process, whose blue prints expanded the medium’s artistic and practical scope. He bestowed on the field a clear terminology – “photography,” “negative,” “positive” – without which the discourse of image-making would be impoverished. In doing all this, Herschel helped establish photography not just as a gimmick of curious inventors, but as a reproducible science and a communicable art. As one recent Royal Society commentary put it, “Herschel’s photographic discoveries included the cyanotype ‘blueprint’ process in 1842…”, and through energetic correspondence he spread these discoveries to contemporaries like Atkins, Somerville, and Cameron.

Throughout the evolution of photography in the 19th century, Herschel’s influence was felt even if his name was not always loudly proclaimed. Every time a photographer fixed an image with “hypo,” they were following Herschel’s lead. Every negative-to-positive print, from the daguerreian era to the age of film, echoed the process Herschel demonstrated in 1839. And the very word photography itself – “drawing with light” – is the word we still use, exactly as Herschel proposed over 180 years ago.

In this introductory article, we have shone light on Sir John Herschel as the hidden architect of photography’s invention. The subsequent parts of “The Hidden Architect of Photography” series will delve deeper into Herschel’s photographic experiments, his interactions with contemporaries, and how his scientific mindset helped shape the art’s early development. By examining original letters, journal entries, and modern scholarly analyses, we will continue to uncover why Herschel deserves a central place in the history of photography – not as a footnote to Daguerre and Talbot, but as a true pioneer who brought the nascent medium “out of the shadows” and into lasting light.

Sources and Further Reading

• Schaaf, Larry J. Out of the Shadows: Herschel, Talbot & the Invention of Photography. Yale University Press, 1992. A scholarly study chronicling the intertwined efforts of Herschel and Talbot in 1839 and highlighting Herschel’s critical contributions.
• Herschel, John F. W. “Note on the Art of Photography….” Proceedings of the Royal Society, 14 March 1839 (unpublished full paper; abstract in Phil. Trans. 1839, vol. 4, pp. 131–133). In this communication, Herschel introduces the terms photography, positive, and negative. See also Larry Schaaf’s analysis in History of Photography 3, no.1 (1979): 47–60.
• Bodleian Libraries (Oxford), “To fix or not to fix? – Sir John Herschel’s question.” William Henry Fox Talbot Catalogue Raisonné blog, 22 Jan 2016. Discusses Herschel’s 1819 discovery of hypo and its application in 1839, with details on his correspondence with Talbot.
• Brigitte Nerlich, “John Herschel: A snapshot of his adventures in photography.” Making Science Public (Univ. of Nottingham blog), 16 Feb 2024. A contemporary overview of Herschel’s photographic work, including the coining of “snapshot” and references to recent scholarship.
• Royal Society, “Enlightened Letters: Herschel’s influence…” (Blog, June 2024) – Details Herschel’s cyanotype invention and his encouragement of figures like Anna Atkins and Julia Margaret Cameron.
• Kelley Wilder, “Photology, photography, and actino-chemistry: the photographic work of John Herschel.” In The Cambridge Companion to John Herschel (eds. S. Case & L. Verburgt), Cambridge Univ. Press, 2024. (Chapter 7) – An academic discussion of Herschel’s scientific approach to photography (cited by Nerlich).
• Harry Ransom Center, “From blue skies to blueprint: John Herschel’s invention of the cyanotype.” (Exhibition article, University of Texas at Austin, Dec 2010) – Describes the development of the cyanotype and Herschel’s coining of photographic terms.
• Mike Ware, Cyanotype: the History, Science and Art of Photographic Printing in Prussian Blue. Science Museum UK, 1999 – A comprehensive study on the cyanotype process, including Herschel’s 1842 experiments. Ware examines whether Herschel saw the cyanotype as an “invention or discovery,” and reproduces key correspondence.
• Sir John Herschel, “On the action of the rays of the solar spectrum on vegetable colours, and on some new photographic processes.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, vol. 133 (1843): 181–214. Herschel’s formal publication of his cyanotype (and chrysotype) research. This paper documents the chemical details and includes the first use of the term “cyanotype.”

(All quotations and information in this article are derived from peer-reviewed sources, historical documents, or authoritative publications as cited in the text. Primary sources, including Herschel’s Royal Society papers and correspondence, have been referenced to ensure scholarly accuracy.)

---

In the Darkroom Diary Premium Members Library, I share my complete library of articles and guides on scanning analog film, plates, and prints—whether using flatbed scanners (like Epson models) or mirrorless digital cameras with pixel shift for ultra-high-resolution scans.

Even if you work purely in analog, digitizing your work is often essential. Whether for sharing on your website, posting to social media, or applying for exhibitions and gallery shows, there are many compelling reasons to create high-quality digital versions of your art. While we may be devoted to analog processes, embracing digitization when needed helps our work reach a wider audience. For some photographers, a hybrid workflow—analog capture with digital output—is the right balance.

Art Collector Resources

• Collector and Student Testimonials [read]
• Collector’s Guide [read]
• Why Analog Photography is Essential to Fine Art Creation [read]
• Why I Create [read]
• Aura – What is it, and why does it matter? [read]
• Why Analog Photography Is a Smart Investment [read]
• Analog photography in the Digital Age: Examining transformation, alienation and authenticity in modern photographic practice. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijads.v2i3.11019